Commercial Gestational Surrogacy: Unravelling the threads between reproductive tourism and child trafficking

Authors

  • Nishat Hyder-Rahman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201221168

Keywords:

cross-border commercial surrogacy, reproductive tourism, child trafficking

Abstract

Narratives of commercial gestational surrogacy (CGS) as ‘baby-selling’ often conflate or interchange the transfer of children born via surrogacy with trafficking in children or the sale of children, two sometimes overlapping but nonetheless distinct offenses. Moreover, anti-trafficking laws have been used to police cross-border CGS. But when do CGS arrangements fall within the category of legitimate ‘reproductive tourism’ and when do they amount to child trafficking? In this paper I critically explore intersections between human trafficking laws and CGS, vis-à-vis the child, charting the relevant trafficking laws in the context of international surrogacy, and analysing whether trafficking laws are an appropriate mechanism through which to regulate CGS. I conclude that while child trafficking might occur via surrogacy, CGS in itself is not child trafficking under international law.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Nishat Hyder-Rahman

Nishat Hyder-Rahman read law at the London School of Economics, gaining an LL.B (Hons) and LL.M (Legal Theory). She pursued doctoral studies at the University of Manchester and was awarded a Ph.D. in Bioethics and Medical Jurisprudence for her research into the development of cross-border governance frameworks for emerging biotechnologies. Most recently, Nishat was post-doctoral scholar at Utrecht University’s Centre for Research into European Family Law. Her research focussed on the intersection of bioethics, medical law, and family law in the context of reproductive rights.

Downloads

Published

29-04-2021

How to Cite

Hyder-Rahman, N. (2021). Commercial Gestational Surrogacy: Unravelling the threads between reproductive tourism and child trafficking. Anti-Trafficking Review, (16), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201221168