Key Stakeholder Perspectives on the Potential Impact of COVID-19 on Human Trafficking for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation

Authors

  • Muiread Murphy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201223217

Keywords:

COVID-19, key stakeholders, qualitative data, challenges, Europe, labour exploitation

Abstract

While human trafficking in its different forms has received growing recognition, currently there is an absence of research providing empirical evidence on the potential impact of COVID-19. COVID-19 and its related challenges provide a lens through which the vulnerability and complexities inherent in human trafficking can be further ascertained and analysed. This article explores challenges encountered by key stakeholders primarily operating in the field of countering human trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation across Europe. These challenges are categorised as increased vulnerability to human trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation; the impact on services and support; and limitations on professional duties. A qualitative method involving sixty-five semi-structured interviews was employed to capture the on-the-ground experiences of a diverse cohort of stakeholders active during the pandemic.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Muiread Murphy

Muiread Murphy is a doctoral student at the School of Law and Criminology at Maynooth University, Ireland. Her research, funded by the Irish Research Council, explores human trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation across Council of Europe member states. She is an active member of the Human Trafficking Research Network based in the Human Rights Centre at Queen’s University Belfast. Muiread has co-authored human trafficking research in Ireland published in the British Journal of Criminology and the Industrial Law Journal.

Downloads

Published

29-09-2023

How to Cite

Murphy, M. (2023). Key Stakeholder Perspectives on the Potential Impact of COVID-19 on Human Trafficking for the Purpose of Labour Exploitation. Anti-Trafficking Review, (21), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201223217