Measuring Risk-based Human Rights Due Diligence: Sourcing and labour outcome metrics

Authors

  • Jason Judd
  • Sarosh Kuruvilla

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201226265

Keywords:

human rights, risk-based due diligence, labour practices, global supply chains, CSDDD

Abstract

In contrast to existing guidance frameworks for due diligence that focus on global firms describing their programmes (inputs), in this article, we argue that quantitative data on labour outcomes are required to hold global firms to account for human rights harms in their supply chains. We present twenty-five metrics that measure both lead firm sourcing practices and supplier firm labour rights and working conditions. We argue that these metrics are useful for regulators to assess how lead firms covered under due diligence legislation are addressing human rights harms in their supply chains. In addition, they are particularly useful to lead firms themselves in order to assess the level and salience of risks.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Jason Judd

Jason Judd is the Executive Director of the Global Labor Institute at Cornell University.

Sarosh Kuruvilla

Sarosh Kuruvilla is the Andrew J. Nathanson Professor of Industrial Relations and Asian Studies of the ILR School and Global Labor Institute at Cornell University.

Downloads

Published

26-04-2026

How to Cite

Judd, J., & Kuruvilla, S. (2026). Measuring Risk-based Human Rights Due Diligence: Sourcing and labour outcome metrics. Anti-Trafficking Review, (26), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.14197/atr.201226265